تعرض قانون الإنترنت الجديد في الهند إلى الكثير من الجدل بسبب اساءة استخدامه. اعتقل مويذو (٤٧ عاماً) الذي يعمل موظفاً حكومياً في ولاية كيرلا لإعادة إرسال بريد إلكتروني لعدد من الأصدقاء يحمل نكتة عن الهزيمة الانتخابية للحزب الشيوعي الماركسي في الانتخابات الأخيرة حيث تعرض الحزب لهزيمة كبيرة.
يقول سيمي نازاريث:
In Kerala, an ordinary citizen, (Mr. Moithu) was arrested because he forwarded an email containing a poster. The poster had the picture of a popular politician (Mr. Pinarayi Vijayan) with a dialogue from an old Malayalam movie ‘Sandesham’. The alleged cyber crime was that Moithu edited out the part that mentioned “this is a joke” from the subject line, and forwarded this picture to his few friends through email. Upon a direct complaint from Mr. Pinarayi Vijayan, who is the secretary of ruling CPM (Communist Party-Marxist) party, police were swift to act, and arrested Mr. Moithu. Hard disk of his computer was confiscated. He was released on bail, but the case proceedings are set to continue as of now, as there is no news that the complaint is withdrawn. “What did I do wrong? all that I did was forward a comic email that came to my inbox”, contests Mr. Moithu. Apparently, the ruling party is not impressed. Many in the party are of the opinion that this cannot be treated as a joke, and has to be treated as libel.
وتلقى مويذو الذي يسكن كتيبورام في منطقة مالابورام النكتة من حمزة قريبه الذي يسكن في برشلونة والذي بدوره تلقاها من البريد الإلكتروني just4ajoke@ gmail.com واتُهم مويذو تحت الباب ٦٦ أ الذي يندرج تحت قانون تم تعديله في ٢٠٠٨، والذي ينص على عقوبة السجن حتى ثلاث سنوات أو دفع غرامة تبلغ ١٠٠٠٠٠ روبية هندية على كل من يقوم بإرسال رسالة تشهيرية. من جهة أخرى يدافع المدون Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat بقوله أن مويذو وَجب عليه أن يوضح الوقائع قبل إعادة إرسال الرسالة.
يعلق كيابالي :
Stifling criticism reflects the lack of confidence in leaderships. It is an indication of what our nation would become if left to the whims and fancies of 19th century communist leadership.
ويضيف سيمي نازاريث:
The dangerous side of this legal action is that it scares cyber citizens into not forwarding any internet joke. Actions like this would lead to a situation where people will be scared to criticize politicians. According to amendments in Indian cyber law (2008), anything that causes annoyance or inconvenience to another person can be grounds for criminal proceedings. These clauses have been put to use in the above mentioned case. The implications of using this law for legal action from a leading politician is far reaching. One can only hope that other politicians does not emulate his model, and not use this law as a tool to suppress satire and dissent against them in Internet.
1 تعليق